ATOMIC

ARTICOLE
:: Bogdan Vulcan
:: Bogdan Marina
:: Bujor Bontas
:: Cornel Matei
:: Cristian Schioparlan
:: Dan Enescu
:: Eduard Munteanu
:: Horia Garbea
:: Ioan Bob
:: Radu Valentin
:: Louis Stift
:: Nicolae Vartosu
:: Andrew Robson
:: Laurentiu Ciuhu
:: Catalin Lazar
:: Gelu Serpoi

ARHIVA ARTICOLE

INCEPATORI

CLASAMENTE ATOMIC
:: Luni
:: Miercuri
:: Arhiva Etape 04/05
:: Overall 05/06
:: Simultan National et.8
:: Simultan National et.7
:: Simultan National et.6
:: Simultan National et.5
:: Simultan National et.4
:: Simultan National et.3
:: Simultan National et.2
:: Simultan National et.1
:: Overall Simultan National
:: Overall Simultan European
:: Arhiva Etape 03/04
:: Overall 02/03

FORUM

GALERIA FOTO
:: Galeria 1
:: Galeria 2
:: Galeria 3
:: Atomic 2003

REZULTATE
:: C.N.Butler 2005
:: :: Sferturi
:: :: Recalificari
:: :: Semifinala
:: :: Finala B
:: :: Finala A
:: CN Echipe 2005 - DIV. A - Retur
:: CN Perechi 2005 (finala)
:: GALATI 2005
:: :: Perechi
:: :: Echipe
:: Cupa Soarelui - Moeciu 2005
:: :: IMP
:: :: Perechi
:: :: Echipe
:: Trofeul iNES-Atomic
:: :: Perechi
:: :: Echipe
:: Maraton 2006

CONCURSURI
WBF
TENERIFE 2005

LINKS


Louis Stift
The evening of the bare Kings

Untitled Document

Bucuresti, 10-2-2005

Duplicate at 07-02-2005.

Difficult boards, sorted out. It was the evening of the bare Kings, on 4 out of 22 we had to play, and when you count the 2 we had no opponents, 5 out of 24. Too much to call this an averidge distribution.

2 of these:

17 N/-

North Louis

North

East

South

West

KQ72

1

1

2 i

P

AK2

3NT ii

P

6

Ap

85

J1084

i

Gf

With

Support

West

East

ii

Ca 14 points

With

Stop

843

AJ965

1074

J5

KJ1043

Q9762

92

South Trus

K

10

Q9863

A

AQ7653

Not the most elegant bidding. If you see NS K must be with East or sec with West. After the bidding with East is more likely. Without interference 6 is 50%. 6 has a less %, because the can be divided 4-1. The top will be 6NT, but can you reach this? Nice for a bidding quiz.

24 W/-

North Louis

North

East

South

West

K8

-

-

-

1NT

Q4

P

2

P

2

J98632

P

4

Ap

876

West Tibi

East Sava

Lead

6

Q1062

9743

K97

2

AK4

Q7

Q93

South Truus

AJ10542

AJ5

AJ108653

105

K

Slag1: A and yes, the K was bare.

Slag2,3: Q and A

Slag3: K, in East discarded, South ruffs.

After that the trumps were divided 2-2, so only 3 trumptricks were lost.

At the end an example of the difficulty of the boards:

2 W/NS

North Agica

North

East

South

West

?

-

-

-

P

West Truus

East Louis

P

1NT

2

?

8

?

10942

?

852

?

AKQ65

South Radu

?

?

What now?

We have the following agreements:

3 promises a 4-card , gf, denies a -stop.

3 promises a 5-kaart , gf.

Dbl promises values, defend on points.

What do you choose?

2 W/NZ

North Agica

North

East

South

West

K7

-

-

-

P

KQ763

P

1NT

2

?

QJ93

West Truus

97

East Louis

8

A95

10942

AJ85

852

AK7

AKQ65

South Radu

1042

QJ106432

-

1064

J83

West said dbl. If South has points, then reaching North will be difficult. And 2 down is vulnerable -500. Not on this board. After K two times was played.

South lost 3 -tricks, A and 2 -tricks.

In 3NT you make simple 9 tricks.

4 becomes difficult, when you think South has points.

After the third is overruffed and North showed already K, Q, Q, do you play A and x ? This is right if the outstanding now are divided 2-2 or, you guessed it, K is bare.

On this board you lose 3 -tricks and a .

I, East, was minus 1 if I had to play this.

Louis, the Dutch player.





© 2002 Atomic Bridge Club. "Atomic®" is a registered trademark and "Atomic Bridge Club"
and the Atomic logo are trademarks of Atomic Bridge Club.